Once one of its
earliest and largest promoters, California has decided to get out of the
nuclear power business. On January 11th, 2018, The California Public Utilities
Commission voted unanimously to shut down Pacific Gas & Electric Company's
(PG&E) Diablo Canyon reactors at the end of its current license permits or
sooner, if appropriate information comes forward to do so.
With the passing of
the nuclear tea pot industry, there isn't a better example of the
hopeful saying “as goes California, so goes the nation!” From Fremont to Reagan, its Hollywood
promotional claim that the rest of the country will eventually follow in
California's lead is on display. After 60 years of opposition to nuclear
development, California has put a stopper on the nuclear genie. The state
has become a world leader in renewable energy, already producing 39% of its electricity
from it - over twice as much energy as nuclear ever produced.
Legislative attempts to go 100% renewable failed this past fall, but there can
be no doubt that that campaign will only grow stronger, with over 100,000 solar jobs in the state, far more than nuclear's
few thousand ever produced.
Claiming that nuclear energy would become too cheap to meter, General Electric and PG&E became one of the country's earliest nuclear power promoters, constructing the Vallecitos nuclear facility southeast of Oakland. Plans for more installations across the state were soon to follow.
In 1958, following PG&E's announcement of plans to build a large nuclear complex at Bodega Bay just 1,000 meters from the epicenter of the 1906 earthquake that decimated San Francisco, Northern Californians launched what would eventually become a global movement against nuclear power. A few years later, with its plans to build the world's largest nuke at Malibu, Southern California Edison would kick off Hollywood's opposition, leading to movie stars like Bob Hope coming out in opposition. Both projects were eventually stopped after years of opposition.
Claiming that nuclear energy would become too cheap to meter, General Electric and PG&E became one of the country's earliest nuclear power promoters, constructing the Vallecitos nuclear facility southeast of Oakland. Plans for more installations across the state were soon to follow.
In 1958, following PG&E's announcement of plans to build a large nuclear complex at Bodega Bay just 1,000 meters from the epicenter of the 1906 earthquake that decimated San Francisco, Northern Californians launched what would eventually become a global movement against nuclear power. A few years later, with its plans to build the world's largest nuke at Malibu, Southern California Edison would kick off Hollywood's opposition, leading to movie stars like Bob Hope coming out in opposition. Both projects were eventually stopped after years of opposition.
With California's
penchant for gigantic systems (including the world’s largest water projects,
its freeways, agribusiness, urban sprawl, banks and military contractors) leave
it to PG&E, the largest privately owned electric utility company in the
United States at the time to claim that it would build over 60 units in its
service territory alone - part of Nixon's call for 1,000 reactors nationwide by the year 2000.
The construction of
Diablo Canyon would become the most controversial nuclear facility of its time,
taking over 20 years to complete and coming in ten times over budget, able to
open only with the legal legerdemain of Nixon's Saturday night massacre Judge
Robert Bork’s his lame decision the day before the Chernobyl meltdown.
With all of its
drawn-out drama, PG&E's strategy to bribe the Sierra Club into supporting Diablo Canyon led to the formation of Friends of the
Earth, which split off from the Sierra Club. Later, with his book Soft
Energy Paths, Amory Lovins would join Friends of the Earth (FOE)
and play a prominent role in launching the global renewable energy campaign.
In the mid 1970's,
as part of Californians for Nuclear
Safeguards', June 1976
statewide Proposition 15 ballot measure calling for the end of nuclear power in
the state, three General Electric nuclear engineers would quit. The
ballot measure failed but the large statewide campaign with thousands of
volunteers so terrified the industry that it agreed to new regulations banning
any further development until a solution to spent fuel could be
found. It would be this initiative that would signal the death
knell for nuclear in California. PG&E would take the rule it helped
produce to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1983 only to be rebuffed. Industry
supporters considered another attack on the law in 2006, an attack that eventually
collapsed.
A year after the
vote, the Abalone Alliance (AA) was formed with the objective of using direct
action to stop Diablo Canyon, while the Mothers for Peace took on the legal
campaign to close it. Based on Whyl Germany's 1975 direct action model, the Abalone Alliance was formed in 1977 and
quickly spread across the state, eventually including dozens of local groups,
large and small. With the addition of Alliance for Survival, based in San
Diego and Los Angeles, estimates placed total membership at nearly
100,000. The group adopted a radical new model developed by the Quakers of consensus as its decision making process.
Following two years
of blockades at the gates of Diablo Canyon, where hundreds of activists trained in Non-violent tactics were arrested, the group's San Francisco
chapter, People Against Nuclear Power was actively planning a rally at the
Civic Center when unit 1 of the Three Mile Island nuclear facility in Pennsylvania melted down on March
28th, 1979. The Alliance's timing resulted in over 25,000 attendees
at the April 7th event, followed by another rally with 50,000 attendees in San
Luis Obispo two months later, when Governor Jerry Brown came out against
Diablo.
After a strategic
decision to schedule its next blockade when PG&E planned to open the
facility, the alliance, joined by Greenpeace, mounted the nation's largest direct
action campaign starting on September 11, 1981. Nearly 2,000 arrests were made
during the ten- day-long blockade at Diablo. On the last day of the
blockade, a newly hired 25-year-old engineer happened to notice that the
facilities’ seismic supports had been installed in a mirror-image reversal,
following a similar situation at San Onofre, forcing PG&E to be rebuild
Diablo for a 3rd time. (The
second rebuild followed the 1972 discovery of the Hosgri Fault, a warning sign
that many believed had been covered up by the utility following its failure to
build the Bodega Bay facility north of San Francisco in 1958.) This would not end
PG&E's seismic nightmare; eventually many new faults even closer to the facility would be discovered.
1981 Blockade |
In the meantime, Santa Cruz activists successfully stopped PG&E's plans to
build another large facility less than 20 miles from what would have been the
epicenter of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake ($6 billion in damages) that
shattered Santa Cruz and parts of San Francisco.
PG&E was
eventually forced to shell out an additional $5.8 billion dollars for
construction costs (and even more in financing) with much of the cost coming,
thanks to President Reagan, from a secret EPA loan. Then Judge Bork saved
Diablo Canyon who refused to look at the NRC’s leaked transcripts in a decision
rendered a day before the catastrophe at Chernobyl happened.
Brown's administration
promised to limit ratepayers costs to $2.2 billion, but with Republicans taking
control of the state in 1984, a new experiment in rate making allowed PG&E to rake in cash. That ruling led to
the 1994 electric rebellion, followed in 2001 by Governor (Pistol) Pete's
deregulation fiasco that included a $28 billion give away, with PG&E's
portion disappearing when the company went bankrupt.
The TMI disaster
that preceded Chernobyl led to a nationwide movement that, given its goal of
stopping the use of nuclear power and replacing it with renewable energy
sources, has been intentionally ignored by most of the mainstream media. In a
matter of years, political opposition combined with nuclear energy's failed economic promises, put a stop to the industry's expansive agenda.
The failure
of the U.S. nuclear power program ranks as the largest managerial disaster in
business history. The utility industry has already invested $125 billion,
with an additional $140 billion to come before the decade is out – and only the
blind, or the biased, can now think that that money has been well spent.
Forbes Magazine, February 1986
From the start, in 1974, when as a result of its plumbing system’s
first test, over 10,000 abalone were killed, the facilities environmental
hazards became evident. In 1998 the company was caught lying about the
massive offshore impacts of dumping
2.2 billion gallons of hot toxic water into the Pacific Ocean daily, but the
resulting fine, which would have been the largest ever, magically disappeared through
the efforts of the outgoing Clinton administration. Similar impacts were
also found at San Onofre. Eventually the state ordered all coastal thermal
facilities to replace their Once-Through Cooling systems that, for Diablo,
would have cost the company upwards of $7 billion to install.
Following George W. Bush's nuclear 2.0 campaign in 2005 with the goal
of reboosting nuclear power, the industry started pushing to extend nuclear
licenses for old reactors like Diablo and building new ones. But once
again, the industry's claims turned out to be false and within years the new
push faltered. Both Diablo and San Onofre applied to the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission for license extensions but when Fukushima happened, both companies were forcedd to delay those plans. San Onofre,
which was just completing the replacement of its steam generators, suffered
leaks in one of the new units, ultimately leading to closure of the two units in June 2013.
As a result of the seismic hazards revealed by the Fukushima disaster,
PGE hoped with a battery of sonic seismic testing, to verify that Diablo Canyon
was safe after all. But dramatic opposition to the hazards of sonic testing put
an end to that. The final trip wire for PGE came when they realized that their
lease of state lands required new hearings.
Just days before the state hearing on June 21st,
2016 the company
announced that it had reached an agreement with a number of groups including
Friends of the Earth to close the facility in 2024. After nearly two
years of controversial hearings, the California Public Utilities Commission signed off on Diablo's
closure.
During the 2016 hearings, PG&E acknowledged that over half of
Diablo's power was no longer needed, nor was it critical to maintain it for any
base-load purposes. A handful of pro-nuclear activists attempted to make
any number of claims, even attempting to do blockades of groups that were
supporting its closure. But the decision to allow the facilities to
continue until 2024 was most definitely not agreed to by groups like Mothers
for Peace, Women's Energy Matters and The World Business Academy of Santa
Barbara, demanding that it close sooner. Put on the record during the
hearings, those contentions and their documentation were acknowledged and could
still come into play. But, there will never be another nuclear facility allowed
again in California.
This piece is dedicated to those activists who gave their hearts and energy to one of the longest, most difficult struggles imaginable.
Please note that a
number of links giving much more background on Diablo are to Mark Evanoff's
unpublished 1983 manuscript on the state's anti-nuclear history.
--
Roger Herried - Abalone Alliance archivist
This week’s generous bouquet of roses amidst the thorns
Regulators
unanimously vote to close Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power plant by 2025 (see
feature article).
Courts in California and Pennsylvania temporarily block
rollback of reproductive rights.
Pro-nuclear Darrell
Issa announces his retirement.
More than 100 U.S. House and Senate candidates pledge to
move off fossil fuels use.
No comments:
Post a Comment