Today, we in the United
States are experiencing something akin to the Biblical slaughter of the
innocents: families raided, mothers, fathers deported before their children’s
eyes, children returning home from school to find their parents gone.
At the top of this weeks’
immigrant detention news, The Daily Kos
reported that ICE allegedly tossed a detainee in solitary for 60 hours
demanding she recant sexual abuse claims, and that if the Dream Act is
repealed, 5,000 California teachers face deportation. And Luis Ramirez-Marcano died in ICE custody, the third detainee to die so far this year. Last
year with 12 detention deaths, ICE chalked up its deadliest year since 2009. But there’s hope Trumpery threatened (in a brief moment of petulance)
to call off his ICE dogs from California in retaliation for California’s
embrace of sanctuary. In Maine, colleagues tell me ICE is busy grabbing Canada-bound
people off local buses, and three little words have been removed from the
latest official statement of U.S. immigration policy. Yes, that’s right: We are no longer “a Nation of
Immigrants.” Whaddya know, just like
that, a snap of the finger deep sixes history.
Nothing much has changed
since 2009 when I first became swept up in this issue. Because so much of the research
is still timely, I’ve decided to run what started out as my interview of a
73-year-old woman in Patterson New Jersey.
Jean Blum was the first U.S. whistleblower to expose a “disappearance”
in immigrant detention. Prompted by her, through a FOIA request, the New York Times
reported a total 106 immigrants had already been “disappeared” by 2009 in immigrant
detention. I viewed the coroner’s
reports. A significant number had died of “asphyxiation.” Here’s the story:
Jean Blum: Finger in
Goliath’s Eye - Part I
© Cecile Pineda 11 22
09
Cecile Pineda traveled to the East Coast to interview Jean Blum. Blum is a Holocaust survivor whose memories of being hidden from the Nazis and living her early years as a traumatically displaced person motivated her to start ALAFFA, an organization devoted to helping immigrants incarcerated in the immigrant detention centers of Passaic and Monmouth Counties in New Jersey, who are held in “administrative detention” a provision of a 1996 law which deprives them of the right to legal representation. Below begins the first segment of her report.
Cecile Pineda traveled to the East Coast to interview Jean Blum. Blum is a Holocaust survivor whose memories of being hidden from the Nazis and living her early years as a traumatically displaced person motivated her to start ALAFFA, an organization devoted to helping immigrants incarcerated in the immigrant detention centers of Passaic and Monmouth Counties in New Jersey, who are held in “administrative detention” a provision of a 1996 law which deprives them of the right to legal representation. Below begins the first segment of her report.
Immigrant detention centers, now over 300, are located
throughout the United States--federally run jails, county facilities, some run
by private operators Corrections Corporation of America and Wackenhut, doing
business under the sanitized name the Geo Group. They house more than 400,000
persons, almost all immigrants, and with few exceptions, people of color.
Her hands working constantly, Jean Blum
loops yarn over the pins of her knitting bobbin; the spool pays out the makings
of a fashionable red scarf. Behind her as she talks, a conservatory of exotic
plants catches the sunlight, bouncing it off an abstract painting on the wall.
Jean Blum is a short 73-year-old woman, standing barely five feet tall, with a
sharp mind, given to rich imaginings.
Jean Blum. photo credit Janice Weber |
Her photograph, taken against a backdrop
of the Monmouth County Correctional Institution in an article dated April 3,
2009, by Nina Bernstein of the New York Times, shows a forlorn looking woman, a
woman identified as a Holocaust survivor, founder of an immigrant detainee
advocacy organization American Liberty and Freedom for All, or ALAFFA.
On a first viewing, I wondered who she was. What drove her to engage for many months in such discouraging and thankless work? Was it her memories of her World War II experiences as a displaced person? Had those memories been put aside as she lived an early life described in the article as closely modeled on the American Dream? Did love have anything to do with it?
On a first viewing, I wondered who she was. What drove her to engage for many months in such discouraging and thankless work? Was it her memories of her World War II experiences as a displaced person? Had those memories been put aside as she lived an early life described in the article as closely modeled on the American Dream? Did love have anything to do with it?
“When I was maybe six years old, my mother warned me, ‘you have to go away for
a while, but you must never forget that you are a Jewish child. You must
remember not to tell anyone, because if you do, terrible things will happen to
you and to your parents.’” Jean Blum pauses to unravel the tangling red scarf
before continuing with our interview.
“The next day my teacher—one of the unsung heroes of the French Resistance—spirited me away to a convent where I lived with other girls whom I discovered much later were also Jewish.” When Blum’s mother came to take her back, although Blum failed to recognize her--“I never thought I would ever see her again,” she explains--the gravity of her mother’s admonition never left her.
“The next day my teacher—one of the unsung heroes of the French Resistance—spirited me away to a convent where I lived with other girls whom I discovered much later were also Jewish.” When Blum’s mother came to take her back, although Blum failed to recognize her--“I never thought I would ever see her again,” she explains--the gravity of her mother’s admonition never left her.
Blum was born in 1936 in Warsaw, an
only child, whose father was an electrical engineer. The Polish government
charged him and an engineering colleague with designing and overseeing the
installation of the telephone and telegraph communication system for the
country of Poland. The first week of September, 1939 immediately after the
first German bombs fell on Warsaw, her father received a phone call in the
middle of the night from the Office of the President of Poland ordering him and
his electrical engineering colleague to show up at the bus depot at six A.M.
with their wives, their children and one suitcase for each family. They were
allowed to escape, not because the Poles were particularly concerned for the
family as endangered Jews, but because her father possessed the information
they needed to deactivate the system he and his colleague had designed so that
it would not fall into German hands.
After conducting them to Romania where they debriefed the two engineers, they left them to shift for themselves. Stranded in Bucharest, Jean’s father began making the rounds of all the embassies searching for a country willing to take them—to no avail. Finally, through their embassy, the French government made him a deal: if he agreed to join the French forces, Jean and her mother would be permitted to travel to Nice, where they would be allowed to stay throughout the duration of the war. Her father, however, would fight with the French. But after the fall of the collaborationist Vichy government he was captured by the Germans. He was sent to a P.O.W. camp, and as a prisoner of war he escaped the almost certain extermination that awaited most European Jews in the death camps.
“The Germans treated him better than Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) treats our American Immigrant Detainees here in the U.S.,” says Jean Blum. “These are people who work hard, many of them heads of families, trying to better themselves, striving for their piece of the American dream, as all of us did. My father loved America; he believed in America because this was the only country that would take us in at war’s end. I am glad he didn’t live to see what’s happening now.”
Although
American public attention is still focused on the horrors of Guantanamo and Abu
Ghraib, the existence of a growing number of domestic immigrant detention
centers still largely remains under the radar. There are now over 300, located
throughout the United States, some federally run jails, some County facilities,
some run by such private operators as Corrections Corporation of America and
Wackenhut, now doing business under the sanitized name of the Geo Group. They
house a total of more than 400,000 persons, almost all of them immigrants, and
with few exceptions, people of color. Prior to the elections of 2008, these
institutions were subject to little or no government oversight, and even now
under the aegis of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet
Napolitano, the new administration is not showing signs of producing much in
the way of change.
"Nothing Happened to you." Margaret Bourke-White |
Blum remembers the limbo state that people displaced by World War II
experienced. When at war’s end, her mother and father were reunited, no country
was willing to take the family in until, through the intercession of her
father’s brother, Sholem Asch, the family was permitted to enter the United
States by way of a special Act of Congress. Used to a pre-war life of relative
comfort, they found themselves living on the fifth floor of a roach infested
Bronx walk-up apartment. Her father repeatedly had to scramble for work, first
as the employee of a brother who owned a record company. Her mother found work
as a fabric picker. Left at home alone, and overwhelmed by the adjustment to a
new school where she spoke no English, Jean cried incessantly. One day her
father came across Margaret Bourke White’s photographs of the concentration
camps taken at the time of the liberation. He carefully cut them out of Life
Magazine and taped them to the walls of Jean’s bedroom. “These are the people
who have something to cry about,” he told her, “nothing happened to you.
“We fear for our lives…”
The pictures of WWII concentration camp survivors remained on Jean’s wall for a limited period of time, but they never left her imagination. When Blum first discovered that there was a New Jersey-based advocacy organization, the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee (NJCRDC), that tracked incarcerated detainees, she was quick to join.
Shortly before the Memorial Day Weekend in 2005, NJCRDC had fielded a call on its hot line from an inmate reporting that there had been a violent incident at the Passaic County Jail in Paterson where a number of detainees were being held. But with the holiday approaching, there was no one available to investigate. True to form, Blum stepped up to the plate. “I had a habit of volunteering when I saw a need,” she says, “and from that moment, I was hooked.” Her first report, running to four pages, documents the statements of four detainees who described being repeatedly roughed up, beaten, seriously injured, and verbally abused by guards.
“This [summary] of the events of May 26…starting at 8:20 P.M. [combines] information from Luis Ortiz, Willy Hernandez, and Nguyen Vu. [Vu] had asked another inmate to have his girlfriend mail him a musical birthday card that he wanted to send to his wife. When…Corporal C. Jimenez handed out the mail, she …wanted to remove the musical portion of the card. Nguyen…asked her to leave [it] on because he was sending it to his wife. Corporal Jimenez yelled, ‘No, I can’t do that. This card does not belong to you.’ He replied…‘no, this card belongs to me.’ She continued yelling… that she would call the Sergeant or the Captain...’ He answered ‘I don’t care who you call over because this card is mine.’
“A few minutes later Sergeant J. Arturi came in, plus ‘about 5 or 10’ other officers…. They told the prisoners to face the bars, aiming chemical spray inches from their faces. All the…reports agree: ‘they grabbed Nguyen Vu by the arm and the neck. He was pushed, shoved, slapped, punched down the hallway in sight of…two units returning from recreation, until they got him down the hall where they closed the door so the others could not see.
NGUYEN STATES 2 VIDEO CAMERAS TAPED WHAT HAPPENED THERE….
“…The sergeant…slammed his head into the wall where it started to bleed. [Vu] felt dizzy. Three or more officers ‘pushed me to the ground, started punching me, pulled me up, handcuffed me and took me to the Medical Unit.’ He was ‘so upset and scared’ that all he wanted was to be left alone and [he] refused medication. Then they …strip searched him…and threw him into the hole…. [In all] he requested meds or a doctor four times over four days, to no avail. The next day two officers took him to a hearing telling him he was charged with Attempt to Assault. He was found innocent and the case was dismissed….
“[The inmates who observed the initial beating] ‘yelled, protested, banged on the tables….’ While this was going on, Hernandez ‘fixed his pants.’ Officers yelled he had a weapon in his sock that he was trying to place in his shoe. He was ‘yanked by his neck, arm and shirt over the edge of the table. He was slapped on his neck …and on his back….They continued to slap…and rough him up. They kept inquiring about a weapon, but it didn’t exist.’ Hernandez states: ‘THEY ALSO RAISED THE CAMERA,’ meaning they did not tape this incident.” Blum’s report concludes with a fourth inmate, Luiz Ortiz’ statement that for now they would suspend their hunger strike “because we fear for our lives.”
Administrative detention: (il)legal stranglehold
But Blum soon became dissatisfied with the emphasis placed by the NJCRDC on freeing all immigrant detainees based on the unconstitutionality of holding them without charge. She resigned to found ALAFFA because she preferred to concentrate her efforts on the more immediate task of helping the detainees directly and believed she would be more effective intervening at the local level. Through an umbrella organization, she obtained tax exempt status, but her efforts to secure funds to support her activities and to expand her operation were largely unsuccessful. She continued on her own, very much as a one-person operation, occasionally supported by the help of volunteers like herself.
An excerpt from an early A.L.A.F.F.A. newsletter dated November 26, 2005, speaks volumes about Blum’s sense of mission:
The pictures of WWII concentration camp survivors remained on Jean’s wall for a limited period of time, but they never left her imagination. When Blum first discovered that there was a New Jersey-based advocacy organization, the New Jersey Civil Rights Defense Committee (NJCRDC), that tracked incarcerated detainees, she was quick to join.
Shortly before the Memorial Day Weekend in 2005, NJCRDC had fielded a call on its hot line from an inmate reporting that there had been a violent incident at the Passaic County Jail in Paterson where a number of detainees were being held. But with the holiday approaching, there was no one available to investigate. True to form, Blum stepped up to the plate. “I had a habit of volunteering when I saw a need,” she says, “and from that moment, I was hooked.” Her first report, running to four pages, documents the statements of four detainees who described being repeatedly roughed up, beaten, seriously injured, and verbally abused by guards.
“This [summary] of the events of May 26…starting at 8:20 P.M. [combines] information from Luis Ortiz, Willy Hernandez, and Nguyen Vu. [Vu] had asked another inmate to have his girlfriend mail him a musical birthday card that he wanted to send to his wife. When…Corporal C. Jimenez handed out the mail, she …wanted to remove the musical portion of the card. Nguyen…asked her to leave [it] on because he was sending it to his wife. Corporal Jimenez yelled, ‘No, I can’t do that. This card does not belong to you.’ He replied…‘no, this card belongs to me.’ She continued yelling… that she would call the Sergeant or the Captain...’ He answered ‘I don’t care who you call over because this card is mine.’
“A few minutes later Sergeant J. Arturi came in, plus ‘about 5 or 10’ other officers…. They told the prisoners to face the bars, aiming chemical spray inches from their faces. All the…reports agree: ‘they grabbed Nguyen Vu by the arm and the neck. He was pushed, shoved, slapped, punched down the hallway in sight of…two units returning from recreation, until they got him down the hall where they closed the door so the others could not see.
NGUYEN STATES 2 VIDEO CAMERAS TAPED WHAT HAPPENED THERE….
“…The sergeant…slammed his head into the wall where it started to bleed. [Vu] felt dizzy. Three or more officers ‘pushed me to the ground, started punching me, pulled me up, handcuffed me and took me to the Medical Unit.’ He was ‘so upset and scared’ that all he wanted was to be left alone and [he] refused medication. Then they …strip searched him…and threw him into the hole…. [In all] he requested meds or a doctor four times over four days, to no avail. The next day two officers took him to a hearing telling him he was charged with Attempt to Assault. He was found innocent and the case was dismissed….
“[The inmates who observed the initial beating] ‘yelled, protested, banged on the tables….’ While this was going on, Hernandez ‘fixed his pants.’ Officers yelled he had a weapon in his sock that he was trying to place in his shoe. He was ‘yanked by his neck, arm and shirt over the edge of the table. He was slapped on his neck …and on his back….They continued to slap…and rough him up. They kept inquiring about a weapon, but it didn’t exist.’ Hernandez states: ‘THEY ALSO RAISED THE CAMERA,’ meaning they did not tape this incident.” Blum’s report concludes with a fourth inmate, Luiz Ortiz’ statement that for now they would suspend their hunger strike “because we fear for our lives.”
Administrative detention: (il)legal stranglehold
But Blum soon became dissatisfied with the emphasis placed by the NJCRDC on freeing all immigrant detainees based on the unconstitutionality of holding them without charge. She resigned to found ALAFFA because she preferred to concentrate her efforts on the more immediate task of helping the detainees directly and believed she would be more effective intervening at the local level. Through an umbrella organization, she obtained tax exempt status, but her efforts to secure funds to support her activities and to expand her operation were largely unsuccessful. She continued on her own, very much as a one-person operation, occasionally supported by the help of volunteers like herself.
An excerpt from an early A.L.A.F.F.A. newsletter dated November 26, 2005, speaks volumes about Blum’s sense of mission:
“A.L.A.F.F.A. cares a
lot about what is happening to you.
—We don’t want to see people maltreated, separated from their families, be denied justice and compassion.
—We care about you because you are our neighbors, our friends, our family.
—We know that if they can do this to you today, they can do it to us tomorrow.
—We are ashamed about the disgrace to our country and the violation of our laws.”
—We don’t want to see people maltreated, separated from their families, be denied justice and compassion.
—We care about you because you are our neighbors, our friends, our family.
—We know that if they can do this to you today, they can do it to us tomorrow.
—We are ashamed about the disgrace to our country and the violation of our laws.”
From
the time Blum’s name and coordinates first became known to the prison
grapevine, she began to field collect calls from detainees incarcerated in the
Passaic County Jail. Besides visiting, she wrote letters on their behalf,
helped them file official complaints, made contact with their families and
lawyers when the jail phone lines remained blocked for long periods of time,
made sure to obtain signed releases from each one of them allowing their
stories to be made public, and, although she is a retiree living on the
uncertain bounty of a fixed income, she gave them money, and helped them obtain
food and clothing when they were released. “They called me only for legitimate
problems. They never complained. In fact, I remember one conversation I had
with a Nigerian to whom I observed that conditions there were abysmal. His
reply was: ‘Jean, it is better than so many other places on earth.’”
Although immigrant detainees are arrested and held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the aegis of the Department of Homeland Security, it is important to understand the place they occupy within the present U.S. justice system. They are not criminals. In fact, “these are people who work hard, many of them heads of families, trying to better themselves, striving for the piece of the American dream, as all of us did,” insists Blum, but she points out that many of them will be deported anyway for past misdemeanors such as having a broken tail light, or not paying tax on a packet of cigarettes because they are being held in “administrative detention,” a provision of the Illegal Immigrant and Immigrant Responsibility (IIRIRA) Act of 1996 which under Title III denies them the right of appeal such that they can be removed without judicial oversight.
Whereas under the constitution, not only citizens, but all persons are accorded the right to defend themselves before a court of law, under the provisions of “administrative detention” an entire group of people—mostly poor and almost all persons of color—has been denied that right. In fact, although mostly staffed by Caucasians, the detention system holds persons primarily from Central and South American countries, the Caribbean, Africa, and the Middle and Far East. “The entire ICE operation is in violation of the U.S. Constitution,” Blum points out, “so they excuse it by saying that [the Constitution] only applies to U.S. citizens—yeah, like being a little bit pregnant.” Not only does “administrative detention” establish and perpetuate a dangerous parallel, unconstitutional system of punishment, but once the law is compromised, it may be used to apply to any other demographic group.
Although immigrant detainees are arrested and held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the aegis of the Department of Homeland Security, it is important to understand the place they occupy within the present U.S. justice system. They are not criminals. In fact, “these are people who work hard, many of them heads of families, trying to better themselves, striving for the piece of the American dream, as all of us did,” insists Blum, but she points out that many of them will be deported anyway for past misdemeanors such as having a broken tail light, or not paying tax on a packet of cigarettes because they are being held in “administrative detention,” a provision of the Illegal Immigrant and Immigrant Responsibility (IIRIRA) Act of 1996 which under Title III denies them the right of appeal such that they can be removed without judicial oversight.
Whereas under the constitution, not only citizens, but all persons are accorded the right to defend themselves before a court of law, under the provisions of “administrative detention” an entire group of people—mostly poor and almost all persons of color—has been denied that right. In fact, although mostly staffed by Caucasians, the detention system holds persons primarily from Central and South American countries, the Caribbean, Africa, and the Middle and Far East. “The entire ICE operation is in violation of the U.S. Constitution,” Blum points out, “so they excuse it by saying that [the Constitution] only applies to U.S. citizens—yeah, like being a little bit pregnant.” Not only does “administrative detention” establish and perpetuate a dangerous parallel, unconstitutional system of punishment, but once the law is compromised, it may be used to apply to any other demographic group.
Next Week: Part II
South Africa’s ruling party decides to sack President
Zuma.
If SA can do it, so can we.
Earth Justice reports: Court
halts Bayou Bridge Pipeline.
Attend “Authoritarian
Tactics: U.S. Immigration Policy and Race with Professor George Wright.
Monday, February 26th from
6:45 to 9 PM at Local 2, 215 Golden Gate Avenue near Leavenworth in San
Francisco.
Keep Nelly Home. Stop her deportation.
Join RESIST outside ICE San Francisco headquarters,
630 Sansome Street at 12:30 - 1:30 PM Thurssday, March 1.
No comments:
Post a Comment